All scores are claimed scores unless otherwise noted.January: CWOps CWT 1300Z January 4•QSO’s: 97•Mult’s: 88•Score: 8,536•Op Time: 60 minutesJanuary: CWOps CWT 1900Z January 4•QSO’s: 100•Mult’s: 84•Score: 8,400•Op Time: 60 minutesComment: So, you can get a medallion from CWOps if you operate in at least 50 sessions in a given year. That would be about twice as many as I normally do but I figure, why not? I also wanted to practice SO2R for the upcoming NAQP CW.January: ARRL RTTY Roundup•QSO’s: 1,083•Mult’s: 85•Score: 92,055•Op Time: 20:00Comment: First time ever to make 1,000 QSO’s in a contest. I only wish I could have worked more mult’s to take advantage of the QSO points. I entered the SO-Unlimited Low Power category in order to avoid being in the same entry category as my good friend N9LF. I can’t say that the packet spots helped with either rate or multipliers, however. The old record for SO-U LP for Indiana was 48,790 so I surpassed that by a wide margin. Have not seen any other Indiana scores that were higher for that category so, hopefully, this will hold up and I can lay claim to a record.January: CWOps CWT 1300Z January 11•QSO’s: 100•Mult’s: 91•Score: 9,100•Op Time: 60 minutesJanuary: CWOps CWT 1900Z January 11•QSO’s: 105•Mult’s: 95•Score: 9,975•Op Time: 60 minutesComment: Another twofer CWT, and more SO2R practice for the upcoming NAQP CW. Towards the middle of the 1300Z session I noticed the right radio, the IC 756ProIII, was not putting out full power. At first thought it might be due to an undervoltage from the power supply but was able to duplicate the problem with several different power supplies. The problem manifests only after several minutes or more of CQ’ing, but the slower pace of S&P does not seem to cause a problem. Temperature?January: NAQP CW January 14•QSO’s: 700•Mult’s: 153•Score: 107,100•Op Time: 9 hoursComment: High bands were very disappointing Saturday afternoon. Rate was actually better on 15M than 20M until 15M waned. Nothing on 10M. So, 80M and 40M were the money bands, but 160M was a pleasant surprise. All three lower bands were quiet and signals were easy to copy. Normally, if I can snag a few dozen mults on 160, that’s a good showing. This was the best 160M NAQP CW in my memory. My SO2R practice also paid off, although the power output problem (see comments in Jan 1900Z CWT) was a nuisance.January: CWOps CWT 1300Z January 18•QSO’s: 68•Mult’s: 55•Score: 3,740•Op Time: 45 minutesJanuary: CWOps CWT 1900Z January 18•QSO’s: 79•Mult’s: 68•Score: 5,372•Op Time: 45 minutesComment: Both of these CWT’s were run at low power and with just one radio, to see if I could isolate the power out problem on the 756ProIII. Definitely not a power supply issue. Installed a booster cooling fan but that also does not appear to make a difference. The radio does not feel particularly warm, either. Perplexing.January: NAQP SSB•QSO’s: 212•Mult’s: 85•Score: 18.020•Op Time: 5 hoursComment: A contest tailor made for whining: low activity, poor prop on high bands, long skip and lots of noise on low bands. What’s not to love?January: CWOps CWT 1300Z January 25•QSO’s: 27•Mult’s: 27•Score: 729•Op Time: 30 minutesJanuary: CWOps CWT 1900Z January 25•QSO’s: 39•Mult’s: 39•Score: 1,521•Op Time: 30 minutesComment: Both sessions were primarily S&P due to my limited operating window, and single radio only.January: CQ WW 160 CW•QSO’s: 472•Points: 1,094•Mult’s: 65•Score: 71,110•Op Time: 9 hoursComment: A personal best in this contest, which included several long runs. Band was relatively quiet and activity was high. Worked three new countries on 160: Morocco, Belize and Columbia.February: CWOps CWT 1300Z February 1•QSO’s: 108•Mult’s: 93•Score: 10,044•Op Time: 1 HourFebruary: CWOps CWT 1900Z February 1•QSO’s: 109•Mult’s: 102•Score: 11,118•Op Time: 1 HourComment: Sessions 9 and 10 for 2017. The 1900Z score was my second highest ever but not quite good enough for top 10. The hobbled 756ProII does OK in search and pounce mode.February: CWOps CWT 1300Z February 8•QSO’s: 105•Mult’s: 101•Score: 10,500•Op Time: 1 HourFebruary: CWOps CWT 1900Z February 8•QSO’s: 46•Mult’s: 44•Score: 2,024•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Sessions 11 and 12 for 2017.February: CQ WPX RTTY @ K9CT•QSO’s: 3,636•Points: 10,709•Mult’s: 1,061•Score: 11,362,249Comment: Guest op at K9CT. Ops included (see picture, left to right) were K9NR, N7US, K3WA, Moi, K9CT and N9CK. Live score tracking during the contest suggested we were the top NA team, with a couple of EU teams having better scores. The total lack of 10M activity meant our score was considerably lower than in previous years.February: NAQP RTTY•QSO’s: 404•Mult’s: 106•Score: 42,824•Op Time: 8.5 HrsComment: Got home from a 2 week vacation late on Friday. Was I rested or exhausted? Bands were long and propagation was poor. This seemed to be the best I could do.March: CWOps CWT 1300Z March 1•QSO’s: 42•Mult’s: 42•Score: 1,764•Op Time: 0.5 HourMarch: CWOps CWT 1900Z March 1•QSO’s: 41•Mult’s: 38•Score: 1,558•Op Time: 0.5 HourMarch: CWOps CWT 0300Z March 2•QSO’s: 22•Mult’s: 22•Score: 462•Op Time: 0.25 HourComment: Sessions 13, 14 and 15 for 2017. These were low power efforts. I was using a borrowed Icom 7300, testing it as a possible replacement for my ailing 756ProIII. Some quick conclusions relative to the K3: good audio, excellent noise reduction; scope is awkward and unsatisfying. Filtering is not bad but not quite as good as the K3, although the bands were not particularly crowded and thus the filters could not really be pushed.March: CWOps CWT 1300Z March 8•QSO’s: 42•Mult’s: 42•Score: 1,764•Op Time: 0.5 HourMarch: CWOps CWT 1900Z March 8•QSO’s: 56•Mult’s: 55•Score: 3,080•Op Time: 1 HourComment: Once again operating low power, to test the Icom 7300. My 1900Z score was a top ten finish. I turned the 7300 off out of frustration midway through the hour, finding the scope a source of frustration instead of satisfaction. I thought I did not need a scope on my run radio, and maybe I don’t, but if the radio has one, I’d like it to be an aid rather than a hinderance. Testing the 7300 in various 2-radio scenarios also shows it can experience ADC overflow or overload from the second harmonic of the K3, even when the K3 is only operating 100 watts. March: WIQP•QSO’s: 141•Points: 265•Mult’s: 59•Score: 15,635•Op Time: 5 HoursComment: A great job as always by the Wisconsin mobiles. Some of them were consistently lounder than some of the fixed stations. However, it appeared the overall activity may have been down from the previous years, or perhaps propagation was just stinko. Still a fun event.March: CWOps CWT 1300Z March 15•QSO’s: 74•Mult’s: 62•Score: 4,588•Op Time: 0.75 HourMarch: CWOps CWT 1900Z March 15•QSO’s: 40•Mult’s: 40•Score: 1,600•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Sessions 18 and 19 for 2017.March: CWOps CWT 1300Z March 22•QSO’s: 35•Mult’s: 35•Score: 1,225•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Sessions 20 for 2017. Operated low power.March: CWOps CWT 1300Z March 29•QSO’s: 78•Mult’s: 69•Score: 5,382•Op Time: 0.5 HourMarch: CWOps CWT 1900Z March 29•QSO’s: 26•Mult’s: 26•Score: 676•Op Time: 0.25 HourComment: Sessions 21 and 22 for 2017. April: CWOps CWT 1300Z April 5•QSO’s: 97•Mult’s: 92•Score: 8,924•Op Time: 1 HourComment: It felt good to put in the full hour at high power.April: CWOps CWT 1900Z April 5•QSO’s: 38•Mult’s: 38•Score: 1,444•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Session 23 and 24 for 2017.April: CWOps CWT 1300Z April 12•QSO’s: 43•Mult’s: 40•Score: 1,720•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Tested the newly repaired ProIII by trying to call CQ for as much as possible. Looks like the power problem has been fixed. Session 25 for 2017. April: CWOps CWT 1300Z April 19•QSO’s: 68•Mult’s: 65•Score: 4,420•Op Time: 0.75 HourApril: CWOps CWT 1900Z April 19•QSO’s: 25•Mult’s: 24•Score: 600•Op Time: 0.25 HourComment: Sessions 26 and 27 for 2017. Focused on “relearning code.” The 1900Z session was cut short by nearby thunderstorms.April: CWOps CWT 1300Z April 26•QSO’s: 38•Mult’s: 36•Score: 1,368•Op Time: 0.5 HourApril: CWOps CWT 1900Z April 26•QSO’s: 36•Mult’s: 34•Score: 1,224•Op Time: 0.5 HourComment: Sessions 28 and 29 for 2017. Decided to run without packet, call history, and any code reading software to see just how I would do having to copy everything without any crutch. Up to 22 or 24 wpm not too bad. Beyond that it got ugly very quickly.